[...] Jesus and Mo Ã‚Â» silly Jesus and Mo Ã‚Â» silly. Dieser Eintrag wurde von Daniel Fallenstein am Fr, 1. Aug 2008 um 11:11 geschrieben, abgelegt [...]
Possibly the least silly question of all!
I know the answer! “because he is the alpha and the omega!”
… seriously when theists tell me that line on the internet (and they are not joking) I just want to shake them out of their stupidity.
I’m sure many of us remember being raised on such pap. All I wanted to know was What is nothing? and Where did God come from? Kept me awake nights. Now all I want is to live long enough to see some elegant, verfiable Unification Theory.
Non-thanks to the theists and other superstitious folk for their enormous contribution to the dumbing of America
Poor Richard says, “As long as we’re at it, let’s believe that God holds the universe together with rubber bands and staples.”
I think the anthropic principle comes into play here. If there were nothing, we just wouldn’t be here pondering. The only reason we can ask those questions is that there is something in the first place.
(Or something like that. Don’t take my word for that definition of anthropic principle. I need to get a shirt which says “citation needed.”)
I love barmaid’s question.
My brother and I recently met through email for a theological battle of wits. He opened his attack with PascalÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Wager which was easily refuted. Then he attacked with the standard ID question: “how do you think we got here? It couldn’t have been by accident.”
I countered that with, Ã¢â‚¬Å“why not? Given an infinite number of universes, coming and goingÃ¢â‚¬â€energy reconstituting in one form or another in each, one is bound to get it right eventually. You might call it the “law of diminishing improbabilities.” :>
He had no counter to that, so we switched to politics. It was all so much fun for me. He got pissed!
Jesus got the right answer and Mo got it wrong. Interesting.
My unabashed, thoroughly acknowledged ignorance of the many things I don’t know is the atheistic attribute of which I’m proudest.
Asking “why” presupposes that there is a “why”. If there’s no god then there’s no why. Simple really.
I dated a logician who always told me that “why?” is the wrong question to ask, but rather “how?” is the right question to ask.
He was a bit of a jerk, but I did think he had a point.
How is How?
Is the question absurd?
Why is “why” the wrong question? Intuitively I feel that’s correct, but I can’t articulate… why.
How is ‘why’ the wrong question? (It’s not. It’s the right question.)
Why is ‘how’ the right question? (It’s not. It’s the wrong question.)
MrGronk and Carolita are correct I think.
Why: For what purpose, reason, or cause; with what intention, justification, or motive
How: 1. In what manner or way; by what means
‘How’ is a question about the mechanism or the process. ‘Why’ presupposes there is a meaning or intention to the process, i.e. asking that question, you’ve already assumed that there is a reason; you’re not just asking about how the process works.
I LOVE barmaid!!
“The universe comes from the same place your God comes from.”
Silly theists. We all know that Xan Kregor is the Alpha and the Omega.
NOTE: This comments section is provided as a safe place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.
NAME — Get an avatar
EMAIL — Required / not published
Jesus & Mo is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Feel free to copy for noncommercial purposes, under the same license.
Please provide a link back to jesusandmo.net
Hosted by NearlyFreeSpeech.NET.