peer
May 27th, 2026
It’s called Hifaz, and it’s not an optimal use of time and effort.
Jesus & Mo is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Feel free to copy for noncommercial purposes, under the same license.
Please provide a link back to jesusandmo.net
Hosted by the amazing NearlyFreeSpeech.NET
Protected by the mighty CloudFlare


Why not use that memory for storing useful, intelligent information? CUPID STUNTS…
Aha, indeed.
H.I.F.A.Z…..best Acronym that fits?
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent” — Ludwig Wittgenstein
There is no Quran anyway they were all destroyed centuries ago when someone ordered all copies be arranged in order of chapter size effectively destorying it value asa text that can be usuefully followed – because Mo said that ‘al the verse before this one are superceded by everything after this point – but given we no longer know the origianal chapter sequence a problem immediately arises as to which chapters were superceded … take all the time you need……
Succubus, did you just invent the word “destorying”?
Fits purpose admirably there! Well done.
The value of old texts that were written well before the Bow and Arrow was taken off the secret weapons list is zero….
slings and shafts and atlatls
and woomeras went into battle
long before we got enlightened
with push buttons and drones
how can one be frightened? https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/14/finding-mungo-man-the-moment-australias-story-suddenly-changed
The Naked Ape or more aptly the Apex Preditorial Hunter killer Ape has been killing everthing that moves for millions of years it aint going to change overnight is it?
I am currently wondering if religiosity is being bolted into AUI (Artificial unintellgence) engines? 🤔
M27, that would indeed be Deus ex machina!
Wholly spirit.
Sorry, misread bolted for bottled.
Imagine that cramming your head full of shit is actually seen as a worthwhile pursuit? Fook me sideways ..
HIFAZ- High intelligence, for a zombie.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nBknDh3UX5U/maxresdefault.jpg
M27,
ChatGPT’s outputs are “regurgitation and extrapolation” of what others have said, not a new interpretation from the source itself.
In short: ChatGPT doesn’t have the main religious holy books because it’s trained on a broad range of public text, not on curated religious scriptures, and doing so would involve legal, technical, and policy challenges. Its role is to help interpret and discuss religious ideas, not to replace the original texts.
Therefore: still bollocks.
Thus , if you assume that chat GPT is a religious person then it passes the turing test, but if you ask it complicated grown up questions it fails? Hmmmm interesting..