veil

└ Tags:

Discussion (5)¬

  1. Hobbes says:

    Fundamentalist Muslims are obviously extremely insecure to force/teach their women to wear such attire. I suppose it has two main benefits: it hides lovely ladies from horny men, and hides homely women to the effect that the husband’s self esteem remains intact.

    As for the women, I suppose there may be more benefits: it hides lovely ladies from Horney men, allows them to flip-off men they don’t like, allows them to wear nothing underneath if they feel daring and sexy, and allows them to play with themselves even in public if they feel horny.

    As for whipping themselves up into a frenzy at the slightest inference of disrespect, such actions certainly support such an insecure nature, as does whipping themselves across the back and shouting “death to (most everyone else).”

    This one was great! Keep ’em coming.

  2. Diana says:

    6 veils of isis and counting…

  3. dawg says:

    Yeah, yeah: now you anti-SEMITES ARE SATIRIZING mOSES. Previously you printed reactions to your boring cartoon strip by dumb christians who can be your easy targets, or to those who would call you commies, which you would wear as a badge of pride. BORING. Rather, why don’t you react to an atheist like me, you FASCISTS?

    When are you going to do a cartoon of MOHAMMED ANALLY PENETRATING ALLAH, like Larry Flynt’s parody of Rev. Falwell that led to a Supreme Court case? Or are you typical boring straight white christian males who are AFRAID to subvert hegemony? If you fascists don’t do it, then what artists who delight in postmodern transgression of the bourgeois values of late capitalism will be courageous enough to depict ALLAH and MO penetrating each other?
    I bet you fascists delete my posts. If you do you’re typical boring straight white christian males who would feel very comfortable working for the Inquisition or the Nazis.
    NOW DO A CARTOON OF THAT EMAIL, DAWGS! But you won’t, cuz you’re just boring neo-Nazis…

  4. fenchurch says:

    @Hobbes: wow, how strange: here in Ontario, women can walk down the street topless (as per a law urging equality stemming from a decision made in the Gwen Jacobs case) without peril or kinky self-flagellation.

    This past hot summer was made slightly hotter in Toronto for all the bare chesticles that some neo-feminists were displaying in celebration of equal rights, plus various Slut Walks to defy the idea that women attired in a specific way brings either protection or harm unto the garbed, yet such is also somehow out of the control of a perpetrator.

    I wonder what it is that makes it impossible for women in some places to reveal a single carbon-based cellular aspect of their person without venomous retribution, but in others it all hangs out and most folk seem to more or less be able to handle it.
    (Oh, and we have a nude beach. Up yours, fundamentalist, sex-and-women-hating cities!)

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.