refute
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Comments(2) Random Next › Last ››

refute

└ Tags: ,

Discussion (2)¬

  1. tebirkes says:

    “Scrupulous invisibility” …

    I’d not heard of this before (and neither has DuckDuckGo SE), but looking up the trio of meanings behind “scrupulous” and then adding “invisibility” sort of shortcircuited my logic banks.

    If there is a god-like being of whatever stripe, flavour, or sort, it strikes me more that it demostrates an invisibility of scruples rather than scrupulous invisibility.

    Don’t suppose there’s a link, if even to an earlier J&M strip?

  2. Donn Cave says:

    Came here with the same question. My guess: the general confusion that results from migrating Jehovah from a tutelary sheep herder’s god who chats with folks and smites enemies and other unwary bystanders, to a more abstract universal. I did find some bible whackers presenting an elaborate discussion about this as relating to visibility, by means of various hedges like “well, they didn’t really mention perceiving much detail” etc. – the point being, they are put to some trouble by some quotes where their god says he’s invisible, and others where someone mentions having seen him. I don’t get how “scrupulous” fits into this picture – the biblical god seems to feel he’s above the need to have any scruples.

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.