cruel

October 23rd, 2019

Is there a word for that? Possible prize! Edit: more than one word will probably be necessary.

└ Tags: , ,

Discussion (52)¬

  7. I’m assuming everyone thought “motherfucker” but we’re prevented by good taste from posting it.

    Another bifurcated-deity comment I like is “What kind of a god would torture and kill his own son?”

  9. Autoimpregnation, or, given the supposed holy nature of the supposed result here, The Immaculate Autoimpregnation.

  12. Reminds me of the question, if you have sex with your clone, is it incest or masturbation?

  24. Google translate gave me “Non igitur liceret quod de mulieri praegnanti matri a te ipso” in Latin, but I would abbreviate it to Autopatripraegnanti.

    Fantasegmancy?

  28. There is a complex for that. Look up Jocasta complex (Wikipedia). Basically mother and son having sex. Since Mary’s impregnation was non-consensual, I suggest “jocastape” as the word, a combination of Jocasta and rape.

  32. “Impossible” was what came instantly to my mind.

    This is not spam. Why would it look like spam?

  36. We need a new word. I propose “Eparfles”. As in, “God Eparflesed himself”
    Why? Because it’s a backwards form of self-rape.
    I’ll see myself out.

  40. Mendincarnatio.

    From the Latin root that means lie (mendacium). For a word with that root consider the English word mendacity. The rest of it is the word that means incarnation: incarnation.

    But that’s boring, actually.

    I prefer David Powers’ contribution above. He suggested ‘suigeny’. If I have a vote, I vote for that. Short and apt.

  45. Jesugnation?
    I really like the Heinlein’s Ouroborosexuality, but I feel like it should not include a second party.
    Maybe autoparasitisexuality, or parasitautoreproduction. Yeah, that one. It removes genetic sexuality from the equation since, to give parentage to oneself, the benefits of sexual reproduction have been removed. It’s closer to a parasitic bacterial or viral replication. Maybe there’s an appropriate word in virology for a case when the virus /doesn’t/ kill the host? (Then again, if Yaweh is all powerful, he could have had Mary live forever, so really he did kill the host)

    /reads wikipedia/

    Ah, there we go: Viral Replication

    And delightfully, it includes a whole host of other connotations. 🙂

  48. The word is ‘parthenogenesis’.
    Technically, it shouldn’t occur in human species and if, the product should be female (lacking Y-chromosomes). So Jesus must be genetically a woman.

    Nevertheless, miracles happen:
    “In 1995, Strain and colleagues reported an extraordinary and intricate case of parthenogenetic event resulting in a viable (male) baby, named ‘FD’ … ”
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987717302694

  50. If Mary was HOT, Yahweh would have disguised himself as a well hung Centurion and had his wicked way, clearly after selection during a heavy wine session he was sobering up enough to realise she was minging and had to do it with his magic sperm hat or whatever….

  51. Ahh. I knew about the assumption, that was sloppy of me. I didnt know about annunciation, thank you .02. I had always seen Mary’s impregnation as tantamount to rape. The annunciation has greater historical support, but the assumption wasn’t defined until 1950 (not sure if that means it was or wasnt beleived earlier).

    While both lytic and lysogenic viral reproduction kill the host cell, this is by indirect effect, (the host cell ruptures open), so perhaps Mary’s death isn’t strictly required since she did rupture open to give birth. The assumption is a great name for Mary’s end. It plays well in english, “well, god’s not a bad guy, we just assumed he took care of her.” Very chic, very “who really cares after she did her job”.

    OoooOoooo… thinking about the power dynamic between Mary and Yahweh, now I want a shirt that says:

    Luke 1:26-38 #MeToo

    It’s a little OT, but man. Until her time Mary only knew of old testament god bein’ all Deuteronomy 6:15. Of course her consent was coerced.

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.