create
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Comments(6) Random Next › Last ››

create

In which the boys return to the devilishly tricky P of E.

└ Tags:

Discussion (6)¬

  1. forteatwo says:

    Epicurus famously said:
    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
    Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
    Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

  2. M27Holts says:

    ^ Yes, but that is already giving credence to paraphysical powers. There is obviously no god who spoke to any man only egregious liars.. end of…

  3. forteatwo says:

    It is more often interpreted as a riddle that proves the nonexistence of god. Epicurus was one smart dude given that he was hanging out in 300 BCE. It gives one pause. Have we really come very far in our intellectual development since then.

  4. Donn Cave says:

    I took a quick glance at a reference out there for those interested in philosophy’s various academic problems, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and the formula cited there has 7 steps.

    I didn’t go on to read all the pages of discussion, but I think the weak point is probably 4: “If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil.“. That would clearly be true if we were talking about, for example, a high school principal, but it seems less obvious that we can critique the motives of the creator of the cosmos.

  5. M27Holts says:

    Haha…

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.