How come there is an implied understanding that evolution is contrary to scripture? The garden of Eden story, the Noah story etc., etc., were illustrations not fact. We aren’t supposed to believe it happened for goodness sake.
First of all I am not religious.
The Quran actually does talk about evolution of life from a single cell.
Another point is that using “probably” is not actually scientific. I get that it’s a joke, but maybe you don’t get that your rambles are about as educated as a Roman Catholic they are just a different view point.
Further to Azurefrog, you also have to explain the current lack of talking snakes, talking fiery bushes, flying equines and other special species.
Though one could possibly just handwave that one with the “no room on the boat” conjecture.
It works for stegosaurs, unicorns, Orcs and dragons.
And maybe the flying equines evolved into reindeer?
The problem with blaming the snake, the Adversary, Satan, Santa or Glochk the Winding Windcharm is that good people, sinless people would not have eaten the fruit no matter how they were conned. A sinless Adam would have obeyed the law regardless of the logic of the Advocate of Evil.
So Adam and his peri-clone were evil sinners when built.
Their design was flawed from the start.
Their designer was not very good.
It made broken people.
Then blamed them for being broken instead of doing a factory reset.
That’s a little childish.
Jesus & Mo (the characters) are absurd, blinkered, and oddly very sweet. J&M (the cartoon) is brilliant: sharp, delicious, irresistible. Salman Rushdie
Jesus and Mo cartoons are wonderfully funny and true. Richard Dawkins
Jesus and Mo make the world a better place, bless their little hearts. Ophelia Benson
In a world defined by outrage and offence and liberal spinelessness, Jesus and Mo is a treasure, whose value we should never fail to recognize. Read them. Laugh. And think. Kenan Malik
The brilliant, celebrated, freaking hilarious atheist comic strip ... Greta Christina
...rays of sanity in a befuddled world. Keri Hulme
The liveliest depictions of Muhammad currently available... Malise Ruthven
J & Mo is the funniest and most consistently thought-provoking cartoon strip on the Net. In a saner world, it would run in a major newspaper. Nelson Jones, Heresy Corner
Consistently amusing, frequently thought-provoking and often heart-warming. New Humanist
Jesus & Mo is one of the most wonderful things on the internet.. JT Eberhard
Wittily captures much of the absurdity of religious apologetics. Mano Singham
I love jesusandmo.net cartoons - witty and sharp! Katha Pollitt
Often hilarious, frequently wry, these cartoons do what all the best cartoons do: they tell the truth through humour. Terry Sanderson, NSS President
...a wonderfully acid British cartoonist... Nick Cohen
I love the scrappy mockery of Jesus and Mo. Freedom of speech
includes the freedom to mock any person, any thing, any activity, and
any belief -- and J&M stands up for this unflinchingly Richard Stallman
...empowering, important and deeply progressive, not to mention hilarious... Council of Ex-Muslims
...humor is humor and this cartoonist doesn't have it.Karl Giberson
February 19, 2010
Science! Providing difficult, if not unanswerable, questions since the Greeks.
Religion! Providing unquestionable answers for just as long.
I wonder how they could’ve invented the source of sin coming from a talking snake AND people taking it seriously (that’s the worst part)!!!!
[…] The cartoon where Jesus, Mohammed, and the unseen Barmaid talk are usually good. Like this one: Snake. […]
was that Jesus’s attempt of pulling the Occam’s
razor card?
How come there is an implied understanding that evolution is contrary to scripture? The garden of Eden story, the Noah story etc., etc., were illustrations not fact. We aren’t supposed to believe it happened for goodness sake.
Regrettably, but unsurprisingly, there are those who hold to the belief that it did literally happen.
I suppose it’s a case of in for a penny, in for a pound.
Then why should we believe in bible, anywhere, if we decide for ourselve, what is true and what not?
First of all I am not religious.
The Quran actually does talk about evolution of life from a single cell.
Another point is that using “probably” is not actually scientific. I get that it’s a joke, but maybe you don’t get that your rambles are about as educated as a Roman Catholic they are just a different view point.
Aw, c’mon Mephisto! It’s a combination of history and fireside stories. Try reading it and you’ll see what I mean.
I used this to illiustrate a post on Hamilton’s Rule. OK?
would not the Occam Razor be on Jesus’ side on this one?
The talking snake is not a simpler answer, because you then have to explain the origin of the talking snake.
test post
Further to Azurefrog, you also have to explain the current lack of talking snakes, talking fiery bushes, flying equines and other special species.
Though one could possibly just handwave that one with the “no room on the boat” conjecture.
It works for stegosaurs, unicorns, Orcs and dragons.
And maybe the flying equines evolved into reindeer?
The problem with blaming the snake, the Adversary, Satan, Santa or Glochk the Winding Windcharm is that good people, sinless people would not have eaten the fruit no matter how they were conned. A sinless Adam would have obeyed the law regardless of the logic of the Advocate of Evil.
So Adam and his peri-clone were evil sinners when built.
Their design was flawed from the start.
Their designer was not very good.
It made broken people.
Then blamed them for being broken instead of doing a factory reset.
That’s a little childish.