Discussion (13)¬

1. r00db00y says:

   February 1, 2008 at 3:00 am

   Spot on Author. Or as our greatest living philosopher, Marshall Mathers III, might say,”You find me offensive? I find you offensive for finding me offensive!”
2. Dick M. says:

   February 1, 2008 at 5:19 am

   A typo? Should it be “..was a person…” rather than “…was person…” in the last frame?
3. author says:

   February 1, 2008 at 5:30 am

   Fixed. Thank you, Dick M.
4. Robyn says:

   February 1, 2008 at 5:36 am

   LOL, this is brilliant.
5. tie says:

   February 1, 2008 at 8:47 am

   nice one,

   your god offends me, but hey I’m not going to lay down a fatwa/inquisition on you for that, I’m not crazy yet

   noone has the right to not be ofended.
6. Ophelia Benson says:

   February 1, 2008 at 3:32 pm

   So did Jesus attend the Archbishop’s speech the other day? He was all about respect in that speech, the Archbish was. But if Jesus did go it would be a miracle (a miracle! geddit?) if he stayed awake – the thing is seven pages of tiny print, and in those 80,000 words or so the Archb. does such an elaborate minuet of on the one hand but on the other hand and I’ll return to that point later that it becomes very very difficult to pin down exactly what he is saying before one falls into a heavy slumber. But if one wakes up again one finds that Dr Williams does in the end come down on the side of saying that yes there should be a law against saying things that offend religious believers. Prat.
7. Poor Richard says:

   February 1, 2008 at 5:25 pm

   rOOdy: catch my blog note, with whiskeyed humility, under previous
   cartoon.

   - Poor Rich
8. Ricard says:

   February 2, 2008 at 1:14 am

   An absolute beauty, this one, Author! It so elegantly illustrates the untenable circularity of the offensiveness argument. Not an argument at all, in fact, merely a childish reaction. Is religion a form of mass childhood? Are believers just unevolved adults?
9. Laurence Watts says:

   February 2, 2008 at 7:25 am

   I think all religeon is childish, and should be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny
10. Poor Richard says:

    February 2, 2008 at 8:57 am

    I think those who say they are true believers actually do not believe what they say they believe, so they just blow up the first bridge by dismissing the threat. I have seen countless examples: “Oh, we’ve been through that long ago,”
    and “Evolution? Don’t even say the word!” and my favorite, “Oh, you are
    definitely going to hell,” but “God loves you anyway.” I also like, :”Oh, that’s
    all too complicated for me.”

    Are we in the Dark Age we seem to be in? The trick is to know when, right?
    You know, this used to be fun. But look who’s running the country and half
    the rest of the world.

    However, being a Cheerful Nihilist, Poor Rcihard still says, “Life is hell, nature is a meat grinder, we are a mean and pitiful species, and God is dead — I couldn’t be happier.”
11. jerry w. says:

    February 7, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    I always give all due praise for the one that seeks out the truth about god,

    but I’ll be sure to run like a bat out of hell from anyone that says they found it.

    jerrywolfe@sbcglobal.net
12. ToddAwful says:

    May 19, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Apparently the bar maid has a corrupt essence. If Moe or Jesus has a pure essence, it would eradicate her corrupt one.
13. Undskyldning for hvad? « Bohemian Rhapsody says:

    April 3, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    [...] Skal han undskylde for at være statsminister i et land, hvor man ikke har ret til ikke at blive fornærmet? [...]