| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | Feb » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Jesus & Mo is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Feel free to copy for noncommercial purposes, under the same license.
Please provide a link back to jesusandmo.net
Hosted by NearlyFreeSpeech.NET.

It is curious that, in an enlightened age, obsessive religious sexual prohibition cunna-lingers.
Don’t be so quick, there! I’m sure someone can come up with a creative way to interpret one of the more obscure holy writings to be a metaphorical critique of oral sex. Give Ken Ham a few minutes with Revelation and he’ll come back at you with a metaphorical interpretation that sees the seven-headed dragon as a manifestation of sexual immorality, and the “head wound” of the antichrist as involving a wound to his “other” head in the form of oral sex…which could mean that Clinton is the antichrist, incidentally.
There’s really only one thing I have to say, which is to provide a link: http://www.sexinchrist.com/
[...] Jesus and Mo » Archive » oral Wenn zwei große Propheten über Blowjobs reflektieren… fellatious reasoning (tags: jesusandmo.net oral sex sexualität religion fun cartoon comics) [...]
Sodomy laws have often been tighter (no pun intended) than the Bible in many US States. They also included prohibitions on oral sex – hetero or homosexual. See: http://www.unc.edu/glbtsa/lambda/articles/29/1/sodomy.html
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law#State_laws_at_time_of_2003_Supreme_Court_decision
You don’t have to be religious to be a prude. *
By the way, how will you, the other Jonathan, know that you are not me, this Jonathan, and vice versa?
*but it helps
Thank FSM for Lawrence v. Texas (2003) in the United States. Anal and oral sex for everyone!
its a pun but its a very good one. hard to pull off a good pun these days. nice job.
boom, boom.
@TaoAndZen – I used to like ‘not the 9 o’clock news’ too…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECyoaWMvU9c