December 13th, 2006
Jesus & Mo is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Feel free to copy for noncommercial purposes, under the same license.
Please provide a link back to jesusandmo.net
Hosted by the amazing NearlyFreeSpeech.NET
Protected by the mighty CloudFlare
what is ‘NORKAGE’ ?
What is Jesus scared of? Can’t he resurrect himself later?
What’s wrong with Mo getting his driver’s license in Saudi? When Mo said that he passed the test years ago he really meant 1400 years ago? And on a camel’s hump?
Was Mo thinking of Katiusha-type norks?
THERE’S A BURKA ON THE CROSSING! HAHAHAHA!!!! That made my day, thank you!
Norks is another word for the female mammary glands.
So is Norkage 😀
🙂 After a short hiccup J and Mo are back on the right track! Keep up, keep up!!!! And thank you, The Author, whoever you are!!!
What? No car bomb jokes? 😉
“There’s a burka on the crossing” nearly made me wet myself.
i love the fact Mo can’t see over the stearing wheel… Excellent one
And not one of you picked up on both Mo (no surprise) and Jesus (on reflection, no surprise either) referring to the Muslim woman on the crossing as ‘it’ and ‘burka’ respectively. Shame on y’all.
That “burka on the crossing” could have contained anything; a woman, a man, a troupe of acrobatic cats, a letterbox. “It” therefore, is appropriate. Like this guy: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/04/suspect-burqa-counter-terror-restrictions
Acolyte of Sagan, 5/9/12, I have seen News footage from the perpetual war-zone between Europe and Africa showing very tall, sturdy human figures in black tents striding across rubble-strewn ground, wearing heavy combat boots. If those were women they were certainly extremely fit, well-fed and powerful examples.
I suspect transvestism or perhaps skulduggery.
Not that it matters, really. If you treat a Burka as a generic, genderless human you can’t go far wrong. After all, the entire reason for them is to divest the wearer of sexuality so seeing it as a person should be quite acceptable to it.