oral

January 30th, 2007

Discussion (13)¬

  1. It is curious that, in an enlightened age, obsessive religious sexual prohibition cunna-lingers.

  2. Don’t be so quick, there! I’m sure someone can come up with a creative way to interpret one of the more obscure holy writings to be a metaphorical critique of oral sex. Give Ken Ham a few minutes with Revelation and he’ll come back at you with a metaphorical interpretation that sees the seven-headed dragon as a manifestation of sexual immorality, and the “head wound” of the antichrist as involving a wound to his “other” head in the form of oral sex…which could mean that Clinton is the antichrist, incidentally.

  6. You don’t have to be religious to be a prude. *

    By the way, how will you, the other Jonathan, know that you are not me, this Jonathan, and vice versa?

    *but it helps

  13. Oral sex not mentioned in the bible? Prov 30:20 “This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, ‘I’ve done nothing wrong.’ 😉

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.