boobs

April 29th, 2010

Deepak Chopra

└ Tags: ,

Discussion (38)¬

  1. wright1 says:
    April 29, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    It must be nice, having a webcomic where the material practically writes itself 😉

  2. Sarge084 says:
    April 29, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    Jennifer McCreight’s blog, where boobquake began: http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

    Her article in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/29/boobquake-earthquake-immodest-dress-iran#

  3. JenniferRuth says:
    April 29, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    The Boobquake experiment wasn’t scientific anyway. Where was the control group?

  4. JohnnieCanuck says:
    April 29, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Control group? Wouldn’t that be the long term average preceding boobquake day? A quick look showed no statistically significant increase beyond the expected variability.

    Am I missing some innuendo here? I hate it when I miss innuendo.

  5. Gwenny says:
    April 29, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    I love this comic. Any plans to support either Draw Mohammad Day or Mohammad Profile Pic Day? Any chance you have a nice avatar sized image of Mo’s head that I could use, with attribution of course, on various profiles?

  6. nina says:
    April 29, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    does it count if Deepak is a big boob?

  7. Alverant says:
    April 30, 2010 at 4:19 am

    Who’s Deepak Chopak anyway?

  8. grouchy-one says:
    April 30, 2010 at 6:03 am

    “Even I’m not so gullible…” – has anyone actually quantified exactly how gullible Jesus is?

  9. atheismwars says:
    April 30, 2010 at 6:17 am

    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

    see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:

    jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE….

    ________________

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

    ETA: follow-up

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html

    see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION – THAT
    OF LIBERATION – not just merely harmless expression…

    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!
    ____________

    FOR THE *HEADLESS IDIOT* called m.shermer

    http://www.skeptic.com/Merchant2/graphics/audio_video/av558_lg.jpg

    his is your *FINAL WARNING*

    ____________________________________
    the really SHARP END OF OCCAM’S RAZOR…

    they mix SKEPTICISM with ATHEISM…

    KABOOM…

    Now I want you to listen to this little f*cker…

    http://www.ted.com/talks/james_randi.html

    Randi:

    When I see your UGLY FACE I understand why you are an atheist

    _________________________________

    now I want you to watch this video of DELUSION…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW2zsobxJDU

    with the atheists:

    they start begging when they start dying…

    _____________________

    Atheists,

    but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH… therefore you FAIL…

    the Death of Ath*ism

    *********************************

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-8-Yxdphsg

    DEATH TRAP

    **********************************

    THE REAL QUESTION:

    DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?

    AND THE ANSWER – NO!

    Atheists,

    GET OUT OF MY UNIVERSE

    you little liars do nothing but antagonize…

    and you try to eliminate all the dreams and hopes of humanity…

    but you LOST…

    THE DEATH OF ATH*ISM – SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD

    Crystal Night, Atheists!

    FINALE:

    Have I said this before?

    ***********************************

    http://theatheistwars.free0host.com/

    ***********************************

    PULLING THE PLUG on atheism

    http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/coles.asp

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3332/3228845133_3599f8108f.jpg

    bye

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090126/as-indonesia-solar-eclipse/images/c52d9d50-7ca2-4c3a-b13c-c866836298c8.jpg

    Einstein puts the final nail in the coffin of atheism…

    *************************************

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7vpw4AH8QQ

    *************************************

    atheists deny their own life element…

    LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?

    ********************************

    ***************************LIGHT*********

    ************************************

    ___________

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC7Sg41Bp-U

    E=MC2

    ____________

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmtK-X_MV0k&feature=fvw

    DOWN THE TOILET!!!

    _____________

    http://open.salon.com/blog/sandra_no_longer_miller/2009/02/13/files/lamb1234553042.jpg

    LAMB POWER!

    _____________________

    UNDERSTAND!!!?

    Shermer – Randi – Myers – Harris – Dawkins VS. NOSTRADAMUS – EINSTEIN – MARKUZE

    you are ANNIHILATED!!!

    crystal night is a reference to when the SUN IS ECLIPSED…

    ————————————–

    Repent and turn to God or be destroyed…

    LIGHT OR DEATH, ATHEISTS?

    ********************************
    ***************************LIGHT*********
    ************************************ or death…

    LIGHT!

  10. Atheismo says:
    April 30, 2010 at 9:16 am

    I see two big boobs sittin’ in the Cock and Bull.

  11. gsw says:
    April 30, 2010 at 9:32 am

    @Alverant:
    DUH! A man – writes stupid books for gullible people. You don’t have Internet?
    Or was that irony?

  12. Alverant says:
    April 30, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    @gsw
    I don’t pay much attention to celebrity news (including movie stars, rappers, “singers”, and so on).

  13. Bodach says:
    April 30, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    Yet another good reason to rid the world of Deepak.

  14. plente says:
    April 30, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Alverant
    GOOGLE is your friend 😉

  15. Uncle Roger says:
    April 30, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    If I had suffered any damage from that earthquake, I would have sued Deepak. After all, he publicly admitted it was his fault. If anyone did suffer a loss, feel free to file suit in small claims court. (Because he either has to pay up or admit he’s a fraud.)

  16. Stonyground says:
    April 30, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    The best comments that I saw on this matter, sorry that I can’t remember where, went something like this:

    “If there is a devastating earthquake somewhere on Earth on that day, we will never hear the end of it.”

    Someone immediately came back with:

    “Yes but then the women will be able to take over the world by threatening to unleash their boobs of mass destruction.”

  17. kiyaroru says:
    May 1, 2010 at 12:20 am

    Did the Barmaid get new glasses or something? She looks different.

  18. Intelligent Designer says:
    May 1, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    “Did the Barmaid get new glasses or something? She looks different.”

    I think she did something with her hair. If you look on the 20th April edition, she wore it long, with her fringe brushed over. Much more businesslike now, don’t you agree?

  19. ketil.G says:
    May 1, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    who is Deepaak Choopak?

    heheh i have heard abaout chupa cobra, but i dont think its the same thing

  20. Martin Stennert says:
    May 1, 2010 at 8:40 pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepak_Chopra

  21. Martin Stennert says:
    May 1, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    And it’s Chupacabra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chupacabra), not “Chupa Cobra”. Sheesh… ^_~

  22. Daoloth says:
    May 1, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=deepak+chopra
    Let me google that for you…

  23. Ophelia Benson says:
    May 1, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    Hey author, J and M got a shoutout on the Telegraph blog yesterday!

  24. kiyaroru says:
    May 2, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    OB
    I like your new avatar.

  25. kudosdc says:
    May 3, 2010 at 2:13 am

    Deepak Chopra was shot and killed in a Las Vegas driveby 15 years ago — and as soon as he stops releasing new albums, we can finally stop talking about him, right?

  26. dmabus says:
    May 3, 2010 at 2:17 am

    let me show you the end results of this particular *ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENTIFIC MODE*
    of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely divorced from
    any human objectives…

    this style has been perfected by dawkins, pz, randi and the other *NEW ATHEISTS*

    THE BOOBQUAKE – 911!

    hey, atheists don’t even BELIEVE IN BOOBIES!!!

    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

    see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:

    jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE….

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html

    see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION – THAT
    OF LIBERATION – not just merely harmless expression…

    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

    Visit for the BOOBQUAKE:

    http://dissidentphilosophy.lifediscussion.net/philosophy-f1/the-boobquake-911-t1310.htm

    how about I believe in WHATEVER I want and you little fuckers have nothing to say!

  27. Daoloth says:
    May 3, 2010 at 10:10 am

    @dmabus. Thanks for clearing that up.
    This may help:
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbandictionary.com%2Fdefine.php%3Fterm%3Ddoofus

  28. simon says:
    May 3, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    GET TO DAH CHOPRAH!

  29. Jerry w says:
    May 3, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    @Stonyground:
    For me, boobs are weapons of mass distraction. Just an average guy here, your milage may vary, especially if you’re in a Catlick church where Mass Distraction is redundant.

  30. Stephen Turner says:
    May 3, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    That comment by dmabus reminds me of my old Monty Python book, which had a piece about The Secret Welsh Martial Art Of Llapgoch. They’ll Never Kick Sand In Your Face Again.

  31. Omar says:
    May 3, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    @Ophelia Benson:
    Ophelia Benson says:
    May 1, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    Hey author, J and M got a shoutout on the Telegraph blog yesterday!
    Could you please post the link?

  32. nina says:
    May 3, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    dmabus

    some of us atheists have boobies, we don’t need to beleive in them, we have the evidence of them

  33. Daoloth says:
    May 4, 2010 at 6:41 am

    @Author. You should be shoo-in for this:
    http://reason.com/blog/2010/04/23/first-annual-everybody-draw-mo

  34. Altair IV says:
    May 4, 2010 at 11:51 am

    Hey, it looks like boobquake had some effect after all. It’s got David Mabus all aquiver!

    Of course, it’s not like that’s a particularly hard feat to accomplish. (http://skippytheskeptic.blogspot.com/2008/05/who-hell-is-david-mabus.html)

  35. Martin Stennert says:
    May 4, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Whenever I meet peeps like atheismwars and dmabus (who sound as if they are one and the same bloke), I cannot decide if I am appalled at how they can allow their passion to make them stupid (or is their stupidity somhow freeing their passion?), or if I envy them their fervor. I mean seriously, there is few things if any in my life that could move me to such high-pitched ullulations of faith and protest. I’d probably have a problem begging for my life with such a bubbly fecundity. I’d just be too ashamed to let myself go that much.
    Wasn’t it Hemingway who said that happiness in an intelligent person was perhaps the rarest of things? Do you think flamming lunatics like those are happier, have an easier life? Who says that reality is preferable to fantasy? I wonder…
    (PS: @Altair IV, thanks for the blog-link, it was hilarious to read… the comments even more so than the entry itself. A clear case where the real thing outshines satires like J&M in ways the comic could never replicate.)

  36. Daoloth says:
    May 4, 2010 at 6:16 pm

    @ Martin Stennert. Alternatively: “Life is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel” (Horace Walpole).
    Those who do both are p’raps bi-polar?

  37. Prithvi says:
    May 14, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    lol this comic strip makes Muhammad look loveable

  38. fenchurch says:
    November 18, 2011 at 12:05 am

    The dmabus-atheismwars spambots’ operator and everyone else in a *free* society/forum are *free* to believe whatever they want in a *free* society.

    What is it arguing for/against exactly? I went all TL;DR on the copy-and-paste-manifesto and skimmed until I hit non-AI with others’ comments.

    It’s kind of hard to follow a collection of unrelated links and ungrammatical spew. A real person would at least have a) a thought; b) a point; c) an argument; d) support for such.

    I wouldn’t give a toss if I were the only person out of 7 billion who didn’t believe in a god: no one can “prove atheism” (whatever the fuck that means) to me, and no one can take it away from me either.

Comment¬

NOTE: This comments section is provided as a friendly place for readers of J&M to talk, to exchange jokes and ideas, to engage in profound philosophical discussion, and to ridicule the sincerely held beliefs of millions. As such, comments of a racist, sexist or homophobic nature will not be tolerated.

If you are posting for the first time, or you change your username and/or email, your comment will be held in moderation until approval. When your first comment is approved, subsequent comments will be published automatically.