Comments on: cover

By: Jerry w

Jerry w — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:12:50 +0000

It’s great to sit around the fire and tell the traditional story to the kids, you know, the one about how the Flying Spaghetti Monster was born on December 25th and later in his life went on a 3 day bender, returning after sobering up to set up things for the world.
Jesus H. Christ, that’s one fine story….. Of course it’s hard to get the kids to go to sleep after that one.

By: nina

nina — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:50:01 +0000

well, sexy is what you can’t see.

excellent cartoon today, talk about clue metre reading zero.

By: Postman

Postman — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:48:36 +0000

This one calls for a hearty, “Amen,”.

By: keeyop

keeyop — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:57:48 +0000

@archbish… revelatory! don’t know why i didn’t think of that before as motive; cover up women’s bodies, and every part of them becomes arousing. or, more arousing than before. oh, of absences and hearts. and other parts. i think i just creeped myself out…

By: Rosemarie

Rosemarie — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:55:32 +0000

This one is yet another brilliant one.

By: ThomsonH

ThomsonH — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:18:11 +0000

@archbish – had similar experience in Iran 10 years ago, saw girl I was travelling with after many days of her in hijab, and she looked (more) stunning… (we’re married now with two children).

Author ! Author ! Keep up the great work and maybe next year the DT will promote you out of the bathroom (it’s good to have goals…

By: Ophelia Benson

Ophelia Benson — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:59:44 +0000

Rational caution about religious fanatics, might be a better way of putting it.

As for the arms – it’s hot work tending bar, and the barmaid’s ‘Thank you for not provoking’ T shirt is an occupational necessity.

By: GC

GC — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:58:21 +0000

I just started reading Jesus and Mo very recently but shit, this is one of the best webcomics I’ve ever come across (I think being an atheist only helps). I just wanted to know why the author hasn’t published his name anywhere… is it for fear of religious fanatics?

By: intolerant

intolerant — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:59:59 +0000

Why does the new Jesus look like Demetri Martin?

By: steve

steve — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:54:01 +0000

â€œPerfect for toilet readingâ€?! Blasphemer!

That’s were I read my dead tree versions of jesusandmo.

But that’s in the 3rd reformed church of j&m, you apostate you.

By: AbortedAgain

AbortedAgain — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:47:31 +0000

“Perfect for toilet reading”?! Blasphemer!

By: steve

steve — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:24:33 +0000

Congratulations author, you made it into the Telegraph; Presents for the godless: the 13 days of atheist Christmas

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/christmas/christmas-gift-ideas/6780020/Presents-for-the-godless-the-13-days-of-atheist-Christmas.html

By: baydragon

baydragon — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:04:51 +0000

Ha ha.
Too many pointy things.
I’m sure the religious right would say each cartoon is ‘too many pointy things’.
Keep up the excellent work!

By: archbish

archbish — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:16 +0000

@mycatisgod @kiyarou – I recall reading a book – Think it was Andrew Dowling’s Godless Pilgrim – in which he describes his travels in central Asia. He describes how, having left Iran, he saw his Girlfriend’s hair for the first time in ages and found it incredibly erotic.

By: MyCatIsGod

MyCatIsGod — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:34:12 +0000

@kiyaroru

When I was in Yemen, I saw a man publicly adomonish a female colleague because he could see a bit of her feet showing due to the way her abaya was lying over her sandals. So the answer’s ‘no’, I think.

By: hans

hans — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:23:44 +0000

@kiyaroru – of course not, females are provocative by definition

By: author

author — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:23:11 +0000

Oops. Too many pointy things. Thanks, kiyaroru.
@Archbish – no need to ask!

By: kiyaroru

kiyaroru — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:13:11 +0000

In the last panel why does Jesus have two of those little pointy things on the bottom of his speech bubble?

Also, is there any part of female anatomy that has NOT been considered provocative by someone, somewhere, sometime?

By: bk

bk — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:03:29 +0000

we atheists are so intolerant of intolerance

By: archbish

archbish — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:52:30 +0000

Excellent. Well done. Can I pinch this for my RE lesson on interfaith dialogue?