Comments on: time

By: Tamfang

Tamfang — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:07:05 +0000

I approve of Mo’s new nose.

By: Chrissy the Curvy Catholic :-)

Chrissy the Curvy Catholic :-) — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:15:07 +0000

I don’t have any problem with celebrating Jesus’ birthday on Dec. 25 – after all, if He existed at all, He had to have a birthday sometime, right? So since we have no way of knowing the actual date, Dec. 25 is as good a choice as any. Though it must be a bummer to have your birthday be the same day as Christmas.

By: Prozacville

Prozacville — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:42:18 +0000

As a man preparing a Revisionist Advent Calendar, I like to ask myself the question: “What would Larry David do?”

(I don’t often get an answer, even from my myself, but I like posing the question.)

By: JOSIAH MWANGI NJOROGE

JOSIAH MWANGI NJOROGE — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:18:46 +0000

Its Jesus or never.Change your life,change others too.

By: Cartoon: Get ready it’s war on Christmas time!

Cartoon: Get ready it’s war on Christmas time! — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:45:36 +0000

[...] Get ready it’s war on Christmas time! Posted at November 30, 2009 via [...]

By: Jerry w

Jerry w — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:33:25 +0000

It’s funny, all of this talk about putting christ back in christmas music.

As Johnny Cash’s daughter Rosanne once said, there’s never a word about what has to be put back into country music.

Hmm, seemed a bit funnier when it was said aloud.

By: A Simple Man

A Simple Man — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:53:01 +0000

On Persecution -

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html

By: Hobbes

Hobbes — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:57:05 +0000

Mo had it right. The real meaning of the celebration is the Winter Solstice (the returning of the sun).

By: Brother Daniel

Brother Daniel — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:52:07 +0000

kiyaroru: When you consider the parallelism with the next verse (which starts with “in the same way” and then refers explicitly to male homosexuality), it seems most likely that Rom 1:26 does indeed refer to lesbianism. You’re right that it isn’t explicitly so, and so there’s room for other interpretations, but it’s (IMO) the most likely interpretation (as well as the traditional one FWIW).

By: Stephen Turner

Stephen Turner — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:49:14 +0000

The former UK law against homosexuality never prohibited lesbianism, reputedly because when Victoria came to sign the law she found the idea of sinful thoughts of ungodly woman sex disgusting.

Those who have not yet looked up Romans 1:26 are in for a treat if they read the very next verse:
“1:27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the
women, have burned in their lusts, one towards another: men with men,
working that which is filthy and receiving in themselves the recompense
which was due to their error.” (Douay-Rheims Bible)