<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: whoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/</link>
	<description>Two prophets, living together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fenchurch</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-175355</link>
		<dc:creator>fenchurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-175355</guid>
		<description>The god-christ tale gets more unbelievable, convoluted, and bogged down with confusing details in the retelling.  &quot;Inhereits god&#039;s heart?&quot; wow, that wasn&#039;t even in the original, and that things&#039;s a messed up story to begin with.

Reminds me of the oral tradition of (missing accents) The Tain, an irish Celtic tale I took in medieval lit class.  The storyline had so many threads in the various circulating versions, that the editors of the modern version of the original saga had to piece &#039;em together by picking and choosing.

Can&#039;t imagine how much wrangling it must have taken to get all the various copies (which needed to be destroyed) of various books that were voted in as canon (word of god can be vetoed by committee, it seems!), and translated from various ancient languages (before punctuation was invented!  God&#039;s law might be missing a comma or semicolon that could change the whole meaning!), and then once that was ironed out, trying to ram the doctrine into people&#039;s heads overriding their free and critical thinking capacities, usually under threat of some kind of punishment or coercion--&gt; this was probably the easier part.

@pikeamus: a favourite one I&#039;ve heard is that if future archeologists uncover remnants of the City of Manhattan, does that prove the Spiderman story is real.  I hope no fans of this story start crying if I mock the writing or the logic of the plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The god-christ tale gets more unbelievable, convoluted, and bogged down with confusing details in the retelling.  &#8220;Inhereits god&#8217;s heart?&#8221; wow, that wasn&#8217;t even in the original, and that things&#8217;s a messed up story to begin with.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the oral tradition of (missing accents) The Tain, an irish Celtic tale I took in medieval lit class.  The storyline had so many threads in the various circulating versions, that the editors of the modern version of the original saga had to piece &#8216;em together by picking and choosing.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t imagine how much wrangling it must have taken to get all the various copies (which needed to be destroyed) of various books that were voted in as canon (word of god can be vetoed by committee, it seems!), and translated from various ancient languages (before punctuation was invented!  God&#8217;s law might be missing a comma or semicolon that could change the whole meaning!), and then once that was ironed out, trying to ram the doctrine into people&#8217;s heads overriding their free and critical thinking capacities, usually under threat of some kind of punishment or coercion&#8211;&gt; this was probably the easier part.</p>
<p>@pikeamus: a favourite one I&#8217;ve heard is that if future archeologists uncover remnants of the City of Manhattan, does that prove the Spiderman story is real.  I hope no fans of this story start crying if I mock the writing or the logic of the plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher D Osborn</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-173272</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher D Osborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-173272</guid>
		<description>&quot;If God just stepped in and cleared up the mess, people wouldn’t have free will. That then begs the question of why it’s important (and if it exists and in what sense).&quot;

Free will exists indeed, in the sense that we can think whatever we want and do anything we want within the bounds of the laws that govern the physical universe (gravity etc.)  it is so inmportant because without free will, the meaning of love is eliminated.

Pets &quot;love&quot; their humans only because their instict tells them that if they don&#039;t they won&#039;t get the food, water, warmth, and protection that they need.  This isn&#039;t true Love, this is obedience and loyalty based only on necessity.

As humans, we have free will and the intelligence of mind to be able to live independently of God if we so choose.  How precious is it then when we do indeed choose to live our lives striving to be with God even though we don&#039;t really have to?  It is infinitely precious. It&#039;s like the joy a parent would feel if their children willingly come and take care of them when they&#039;re old.  As adults, human&#039;s don&#039;t need their parents to survive anymore so there&#039;s no real logical reason to help their parents as they get old.  However, if we love our parents we we help them out anyway.  This should give the parents the greatest joy as long as the children have not legal obligation or natural reason of necessity to serve them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If God just stepped in and cleared up the mess, people wouldn’t have free will. That then begs the question of why it’s important (and if it exists and in what sense).&#8221;</p>
<p>Free will exists indeed, in the sense that we can think whatever we want and do anything we want within the bounds of the laws that govern the physical universe (gravity etc.)  it is so inmportant because without free will, the meaning of love is eliminated.</p>
<p>Pets &#8220;love&#8221; their humans only because their instict tells them that if they don&#8217;t they won&#8217;t get the food, water, warmth, and protection that they need.  This isn&#8217;t true Love, this is obedience and loyalty based only on necessity.</p>
<p>As humans, we have free will and the intelligence of mind to be able to live independently of God if we so choose.  How precious is it then when we do indeed choose to live our lives striving to be with God even though we don&#8217;t really have to?  It is infinitely precious. It&#8217;s like the joy a parent would feel if their children willingly come and take care of them when they&#8217;re old.  As adults, human&#8217;s don&#8217;t need their parents to survive anymore so there&#8217;s no real logical reason to help their parents as they get old.  However, if we love our parents we we help them out anyway.  This should give the parents the greatest joy as long as the children have not legal obligation or natural reason of necessity to serve them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzio</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-154659</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-154659</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a religious person, and I wonder if there are more &quot;believers&quot; who like to read this strip. I personally find those strips clever, most of the time, and sometimes funny. It makes a good analizis about people&#039;s beliefs, and how they think their beliefs are so true and so simple, just because they believe on them. However, I dislike how it sometimes, rarelly, the author is not trying to show the inherent contractions of a religious system, or to analise them... sometimes the author only try to offend the religious figures, and I don&#039;t see the point of it... I find it useless, silly, and yes, disrespectful without a good reason. I&#039;m not talkin of this strip in particular... but about others, like the one of the elevator and the Holy Spirit, the one of the seagul or the one of the sperm... what was the point of them, anyway? they make an interesting remark on the religious beliefs of christians or muslims? I don&#039;t think so, and I think the author could avoid such material, without loosing its touch and popularity. It&#039;s not neccesary to be so rednecky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a religious person, and I wonder if there are more &#8220;believers&#8221; who like to read this strip. I personally find those strips clever, most of the time, and sometimes funny. It makes a good analizis about people&#8217;s beliefs, and how they think their beliefs are so true and so simple, just because they believe on them. However, I dislike how it sometimes, rarelly, the author is not trying to show the inherent contractions of a religious system, or to analise them&#8230; sometimes the author only try to offend the religious figures, and I don&#8217;t see the point of it&#8230; I find it useless, silly, and yes, disrespectful without a good reason. I&#8217;m not talkin of this strip in particular&#8230; but about others, like the one of the elevator and the Holy Spirit, the one of the seagul or the one of the sperm&#8230; what was the point of them, anyway? they make an interesting remark on the religious beliefs of christians or muslims? I don&#8217;t think so, and I think the author could avoid such material, without loosing its touch and popularity. It&#8217;s not neccesary to be so rednecky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-152503</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-152503</guid>
		<description>A bit more than three hours, I think. More like 12 surely? The point still stands regardless of the duration, though. Wasn&#039;t Jesus supposed to have experienced super-omni-sin-based suffering, though? The other counter to it is the notion of free will. People have the power to stop suffering and other evil, but don&#039;t. If God just stepped in and cleared up the mess, people wouldn&#039;t have free will. That then begs the question of why it&#039;s important (and if it exists and in what sense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit more than three hours, I think. More like 12 surely? The point still stands regardless of the duration, though. Wasn&#8217;t Jesus supposed to have experienced super-omni-sin-based suffering, though? The other counter to it is the notion of free will. People have the power to stop suffering and other evil, but don&#8217;t. If God just stepped in and cleared up the mess, people wouldn&#8217;t have free will. That then begs the question of why it&#8217;s important (and if it exists and in what sense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azurefrog</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-150031</link>
		<dc:creator>azurefrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-150031</guid>
		<description>&quot;His real sacrifice was to inherit God’s heart and feel the same pain and sorrow that God feels every moment a single human suffers.&quot;

A large part of human suffering was directly inflicted by this same god.  If god feels so bad about it, why doesn&#039;t he do something about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;His real sacrifice was to inherit God’s heart and feel the same pain and sorrow that God feels every moment a single human suffers.&#8221;</p>
<p>A large part of human suffering was directly inflicted by this same god.  If god feels so bad about it, why doesn&#8217;t he do something about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: author</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-148713</link>
		<dc:creator>author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-148713</guid>
		<description>Unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher D. Osborn</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-148654</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher D. Osborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-148654</guid>
		<description>Jesus wasn&#039;t just crucified.  Jesus inherited God&#039;s heart, which is the greatest sacrifice any human can make.  To inherit God&#039;s heart is to love as God loves and feel as God feels.  God, as the creator and master of the universe, is everywhere, so whenever we feel pain(physical or emotional), He feels is just as keenly.  On the other hand, God is our parent, so when we feel pain he not only feels is directly as if He was feeling it Himself, but He feels it indirectly as a parent would.  When Jesus saw all the faces and actions of all the sinners of all the sinners(all human beings) who ever existed, he felt their pain both as they would themselves and as God does as our parent watching give and receive so much suffering.

So my belief is that while Jesus&#039; physical suffering at his crucification was horrific, it wasn&#039;t much worse than others before and after them.  You know, they still do it today some places, such as Cameroon on the west coast of Africa.  His real sacrifice was to inherit God&#039;s heart and feel the same pain and sorrow that God feels every moment a single human suffers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus wasn&#8217;t just crucified.  Jesus inherited God&#8217;s heart, which is the greatest sacrifice any human can make.  To inherit God&#8217;s heart is to love as God loves and feel as God feels.  God, as the creator and master of the universe, is everywhere, so whenever we feel pain(physical or emotional), He feels is just as keenly.  On the other hand, God is our parent, so when we feel pain he not only feels is directly as if He was feeling it Himself, but He feels it indirectly as a parent would.  When Jesus saw all the faces and actions of all the sinners of all the sinners(all human beings) who ever existed, he felt their pain both as they would themselves and as God does as our parent watching give and receive so much suffering.</p>
<p>So my belief is that while Jesus&#8217; physical suffering at his crucification was horrific, it wasn&#8217;t much worse than others before and after them.  You know, they still do it today some places, such as Cameroon on the west coast of Africa.  His real sacrifice was to inherit God&#8217;s heart and feel the same pain and sorrow that God feels every moment a single human suffers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamfang</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-144658</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamfang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-144658</guid>
		<description>Which park does Barmaid have in mind?

Presumably in Heaven you get your boredom gland excised.

We can&#039;t know when the &quot;holy days&quot; end without knowing what, if anything, is holy to the Author.  If the Author is a pantheist, the &quot;holy days&quot; may go on forever!

&lt;b&gt;Dick M&lt;/b&gt;: More interesting imho than who made the sacrifice &#8212; &lt;i&gt;to whom&lt;/i&gt; was the sacrifice made?

&lt;b&gt;Ketil G&lt;/b&gt;: You and William the Bloody Awful Poet.

&lt;b&gt;Sarge084&lt;/b&gt;: One still prefers that fiction make sense.

&lt;b&gt;Hobbes&lt;/b&gt;: Most of &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; gun-nut friends are atheists.

&lt;b&gt;Hobbes&lt;/b&gt;: Most of &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; gun-nut friends are atheists.

&lt;b&gt;grouchy-one&lt;/b&gt;: I know someone whose father was raised in a strict Christer community in rural Arizona, then took a comparative religion class at Stanford.  When he heard the words &quot;Many cultures have a resurrection myth&quot; his faith went kablooey.

&lt;b&gt;Jane&amp;imChristian&lt;/b&gt;: You need to distinguish between ignorance and non-belief.

&lt;b&gt;Colonel Leisure&lt;/b&gt;: You remind me of something that (i think) C S Lewis said: &quot;When I became a man I put off childish things, including the fear of being thought childish.&quot;

&lt;b&gt;Uncle Roger&lt;/b&gt;: You need to distinguish between legal rights and moral rights.  By the way, the First Amendment doesn&#039;t actually say &quot;the gov needs to stay out of the whole fairy tale business&quot;; as written, it forbids FedGov to establish &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; disestablish any churches &#8211; the last state churches weren&#039;t disestablished until a generation later. &#8212; Be fair, wolves would likely leave some bones behind.

&lt;b&gt;pzdummy&lt;/b&gt;: Do you happen to know what drugs (other than faith) this &quot;Nostradamus&quot; favors?

&lt;b&gt;John The Geologist&lt;/b&gt;: Blasphemy? Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which park does Barmaid have in mind?</p>
<p>Presumably in Heaven you get your boredom gland excised.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t know when the &#8220;holy days&#8221; end without knowing what, if anything, is holy to the Author.  If the Author is a pantheist, the &#8220;holy days&#8221; may go on forever!</p>
<p><b>Dick M</b>: More interesting imho than who made the sacrifice &mdash; <i>to whom</i> was the sacrifice made?</p>
<p><b>Ketil G</b>: You and William the Bloody Awful Poet.</p>
<p><b>Sarge084</b>: One still prefers that fiction make sense.</p>
<p><b>Hobbes</b>: Most of <i>my</i> gun-nut friends are atheists.</p>
<p><b>Hobbes</b>: Most of <i>my</i> gun-nut friends are atheists.</p>
<p><b>grouchy-one</b>: I know someone whose father was raised in a strict Christer community in rural Arizona, then took a comparative religion class at Stanford.  When he heard the words &#8220;Many cultures have a resurrection myth&#8221; his faith went kablooey.</p>
<p><b>Jane&amp;imChristian</b>: You need to distinguish between ignorance and non-belief.</p>
<p><b>Colonel Leisure</b>: You remind me of something that (i think) C S Lewis said: &#8220;When I became a man I put off childish things, including the fear of being thought childish.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>Uncle Roger</b>: You need to distinguish between legal rights and moral rights.  By the way, the First Amendment doesn&#8217;t actually say &#8220;the gov needs to stay out of the whole fairy tale business&#8221;; as written, it forbids FedGov to establish <i>or</i> disestablish any churches &ndash; the last state churches weren&#8217;t disestablished until a generation later. &mdash; Be fair, wolves would likely leave some bones behind.</p>
<p><b>pzdummy</b>: Do you happen to know what drugs (other than faith) this &#8220;Nostradamus&#8221; favors?</p>
<p><b>John The Geologist</b>: Blasphemy? Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Stinque Zombie Bible Authors&#8230; &#171; &#8220;Gone Fishin&#8217;: Postcards From God&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-144201</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Stinque Zombie Bible Authors&#8230; &#171; &#8220;Gone Fishin&#8217;: Postcards From God&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-144201</guid>
		<description>[...] I really only meant for there to be a few, select zombie scenes.Â  You know, Hippie Jesus gets slightly killed and comes back, complete with holes in extremeties; a few graves open up once My vacation is over - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I really only meant for there to be a few, select zombie scenes.Â  You know, Hippie Jesus gets slightly killed and comes back, complete with holes in extremeties; a few graves open up once My vacation is over &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.H. Bering</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/04/08/whoop/#comment-144155</link>
		<dc:creator>P.H. Bering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/?p=529#comment-144155</guid>
		<description>We have been missing Jesus and Mo for many days now. Hope you will pick up the good work again!
But if not, thanks for many a good laugh, not to speak of much afterthought. At least I hope your archives will remain on the net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been missing Jesus and Mo for many days now. Hope you will pick up the good work again!<br />
But if not, thanks for many a good laugh, not to speak of much afterthought. At least I hope your archives will remain on the net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: a0b44b9cc2a5f518c737a8932a15111e
Cache created: 11-02-2012 02:13:08
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0(5)
-->
