Comments on: bill

By: fenchurch

fenchurch — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:07:04 +0000

Bill O’Reilly? Bold? Fresh? Remembers lessons? Rich? Listened-to?
You can’t explain that!

By: Yelinna

Yelinna — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:22:26 +0000

A barbarian born in a working class?? Listened by millions of people???
I thought Jesus was talking about Hitler!!

oh, sure, I see now what kind of God is out there…

By: Trev

Trev — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:11:17 +0000

RLY!

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:58:40 +0000

ORLY?

By: Hobbes

Hobbes — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:39:33 +0000

Anyway, Jesus is wrong. It’s not a miricle, it’s a non sequitur, as are most of the “proofs.” Come to think of it, so is O’Reilly.

By: JoJo

JoJo — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:21:15 +0000

O’Reilly is actually cleverly putting himself so far in to the absurd that satire becomes redundant and he is no longer ridiculed on a daily basis. At least I’m assuming that’s what he’s up to. He could just be a fuckwit.

By: Hobbes

Hobbes — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:34:57 +0000

Actually, the existence of O’Reilly, Dick Cheney and his bitch, GWB, only shows that evolution often makes mistakes, producing invalid results. Reversions, if you will.

By: Michael Drake

Michael Drake — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:58:20 +0000

O’Reilly’s success proves that if there is a God, He has an inordinate fondness for morons. (With apologies to JBS Haldane.)

By: Ophelia Benson

Ophelia Benson — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:09:29 +0000

Well you see it’s rather like the flower argument for the existence of God, which in turn is very like the waterfall argument for the existence of God. It goes like this:

See this flower [waterfall]? Therefore God exists.

So you just make it

See Bill O’Reilly? Therefore God exists.

It’s unanswerable. I’m sure the barmaid would agree.

By: MrGronk

MrGronk — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:29:20 +0000

I suspect that when O’Reilly tries this argument out on unbelievers they all end up saying “Jesus”.
Weak pun but I need to try out my avatar.