<?xml version="1.0" encoding=""?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: silly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/</link>
	<description>Comic featuring Jesus and Mohammed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yelinna</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-129076</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-129076</guid>
		<description>I LOVE barmaid!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE barmaid!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toast in the machine</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-103537</link>
		<dc:creator>Toast in the machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-103537</guid>
		<description>MrGronk and Carolita are correct I think.

Why: For what purpose, reason, or cause; with what intention, justification, or motive

How: 1.  In what manner or way; by what means

From www.thefreedictionary.com

&#039;How&#039; is a question about the mechanism or the process. &#039;Why&#039; presupposes there is a meaning or intention to the process, i.e. asking that question, you&#039;ve already assumed that there is a reason; you&#039;re not just asking about how the process works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MrGronk and Carolita are correct I think.</p>
<p>Why: For what purpose, reason, or cause; with what intention, justification, or motive</p>
<p>How: 1.  In what manner or way; by what means</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com</a></p>
<p>&#8216;How&#8217; is a question about the mechanism or the process. &#8216;Why&#8217; presupposes there is a meaning or intention to the process, i.e. asking that question, you&#8217;ve already assumed that there is a reason; you&#8217;re not just asking about how the process works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooterz</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-102578</link>
		<dc:creator>hooterz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-102578</guid>
		<description>How is &#039;why&#039; the wrong question? (It&#039;s not. It&#039;s the right question.)
Why is &#039;how&#039; the right question? (It&#039;s not. It&#039;s the wrong question.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is &#8216;why&#8217; the wrong question? (It&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s the right question.)<br />
Why is &#8216;how&#8217; the right question? (It&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s the wrong question.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huinca</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-102484</link>
		<dc:creator>Huinca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-102484</guid>
		<description>Why is &quot;why&quot; the wrong question? Intuitively I feel that&#039;s correct, but I can&#039;t articulate... why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is &#8220;why&#8221; the wrong question? Intuitively I feel that&#8217;s correct, but I can&#8217;t articulate&#8230; why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonkTheClown</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-102478</link>
		<dc:creator>HonkTheClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-102478</guid>
		<description>How is How?

Is the question absurd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is How?</p>
<p>Is the question absurd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolita</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-101607</link>
		<dc:creator>carolita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-101607</guid>
		<description>I dated a logician who always told me that &quot;why?&quot; is the wrong question to ask, but rather &quot;how?&quot; is the right question to ask.  

He was a bit of a jerk, but I did think he had a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dated a logician who always told me that &#8220;why?&#8221; is the wrong question to ask, but rather &#8220;how?&#8221; is the right question to ask.  </p>
<p>He was a bit of a jerk, but I did think he had a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGronk</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-101143</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-101143</guid>
		<description>Asking &quot;why&quot; presupposes that there is a &quot;why&quot;. If there&#039;s no god then there&#039;s no why. Simple really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asking &#8220;why&#8221; presupposes that there is a &#8220;why&#8221;. If there&#8217;s no god then there&#8217;s no why. Simple really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trev</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-101126</link>
		<dc:creator>Trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-101126</guid>
		<description>My unabashed, thoroughly acknowledged ignorance of the many things I don&#039;t know is the atheistic attribute of which I&#039;m proudest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My unabashed, thoroughly acknowledged ignorance of the many things I don&#8217;t know is the atheistic attribute of which I&#8217;m proudest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100325</guid>
		<description>Jesus got the right answer and Mo got it wrong. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus got the right answer and Mo got it wrong. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobbes</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100296</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100296</guid>
		<description>I love barmaid&#039;s question.

My brother and I recently met through email for a theological battle of wits. He opened his attack with Pascalâ€™s Wager which was easily refuted. Then he attacked with the standard ID question: &quot;how do you think we got here? It couldn&#039;t have been by accident.&quot;

I countered that with, â€œwhy not? Given an &lt;i&gt;infinite&lt;/i&gt; number of universes, coming and goingâ€”energy reconstituting in one form or another in each, one is bound to get it right eventually. You might call it the &quot;law of diminishing improbabilities.&quot; :&gt;

He had no counter to that, so we switched to politics. It was all so much fun for me. He got pissed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love barmaid&#8217;s question.</p>
<p>My brother and I recently met through email for a theological battle of wits. He opened his attack with Pascalâ€™s Wager which was easily refuted. Then he attacked with the standard ID question: &#8220;how do you think we got here? It couldn&#8217;t have been by accident.&#8221;</p>
<p>I countered that with, â€œwhy not? Given an <i>infinite</i> number of universes, coming and goingâ€”energy reconstituting in one form or another in each, one is bound to get it right eventually. You might call it the &#8220;law of diminishing improbabilities.&#8221; :&gt;</p>
<p>He had no counter to that, so we switched to politics. It was all so much fun for me. He got pissed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrÃ©s Diplotti</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100290</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrÃ©s Diplotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100290</guid>
		<description>I think the anthropic principle comes into play here. If there were nothing, we just wouldn&#039;t be here pondering. The only reason we can ask those questions is that there is something in the first place.

(Or something like that. Don&#039;t take my word for that definition of anthropic principle. I need to get a shirt which says &quot;citation needed.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the anthropic principle comes into play here. If there were nothing, we just wouldn&#8217;t be here pondering. The only reason we can ask those questions is that there is something in the first place.</p>
<p>(Or something like that. Don&#8217;t take my word for that definition of anthropic principle. I need to get a shirt which says &#8220;citation needed.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poor Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100236</link>
		<dc:creator>Poor Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100236</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure many of us remember being raised on such pap.  All I wanted to know  was What is nothing?  and Where did God come from?  Kept me awake nights.  Now all I want is to live long enough to see some elegant, verfiable  Unification Theory.  

Non-thanks to the theists and other superstitious folk for their enormous contribution to the dumbing of America

Poor Richard says, &quot;As long as we&#039;re at it, let&#039;s believe that God holds the universe together with rubber bands and staples.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure many of us remember being raised on such pap.  All I wanted to know  was What is nothing?  and Where did God come from?  Kept me awake nights.  Now all I want is to live long enough to see some elegant, verfiable  Unification Theory.  </p>
<p>Non-thanks to the theists and other superstitious folk for their enormous contribution to the dumbing of America</p>
<p>Poor Richard says, &#8220;As long as we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s believe that God holds the universe together with rubber bands and staples.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tie</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100189</link>
		<dc:creator>tie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100189</guid>
		<description>I know the answer! &quot;because he is the alpha and the omega!&quot;

... seriously when theists tell me that line on the internet (and they are not joking) I just want to shake them out of their stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the answer! &#8220;because he is the alpha and the omega!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; seriously when theists tell me that line on the internet (and they are not joking) I just want to shake them out of their stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100173</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100173</guid>
		<description>Possibly the least silly question of all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly the least silly question of all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesetipp: Jesus and Mo Â» silly &#171; Freunde der offenen Gesellschaft</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/comment-page-1/#comment-100166</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesetipp: Jesus and Mo Â» silly &#171; Freunde der offenen Gesellschaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/08/01/silly/#comment-100166</guid>
		<description>[...] Jesus and Mo Â»&#160;silly  Jesus and Mo Â» silly.    Dieser Eintrag wurde von Daniel Fallenstein am Fr, 1. Aug 2008 um 11:11 geschrieben, abgelegt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jesus and Mo Â»&nbsp;silly  Jesus and Mo Â» silly.    Dieser Eintrag wurde von Daniel Fallenstein am Fr, 1. Aug 2008 um 11:11 geschrieben, abgelegt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
