<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: same</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/</link>
	<description>Two prophets, living together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fenchurch</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-175272</link>
		<dc:creator>fenchurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-175272</guid>
		<description>@Daz: Statistics can be made up for anything.  Don&#039;t be too stressed that someone edjjumicated might be fooled by it!

There are no stats provided to support Jesus&#039; being 110% more peaceful.
You may safely disregard the frustrating pimp-my-deity-assertions-with-no-evidence from the fanboy JohnWrot.

It&#039;s like a detergent advert claiming to be 110% more effective.
More effective than what?  Using only water? The leading competition?  The same product, from a previous iteration?

Any, note the lack of parallel, comparing peace to violence.  How do those units measure up?  What are the j-man&#039;s stats for violence, and the m-man&#039;s stats for peace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daz: Statistics can be made up for anything.  Don&#8217;t be too stressed that someone edjjumicated might be fooled by it!</p>
<p>There are no stats provided to support Jesus&#8217; being 110% more peaceful.<br />
You may safely disregard the frustrating pimp-my-deity-assertions-with-no-evidence from the fanboy JohnWrot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a detergent advert claiming to be 110% more effective.<br />
More effective than what?  Using only water? The leading competition?  The same product, from a previous iteration?</p>
<p>Any, note the lack of parallel, comparing peace to violence.  How do those units measure up?  What are the j-man&#8217;s stats for violence, and the m-man&#8217;s stats for peace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athebuddhist</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-172736</link>
		<dc:creator>athebuddhist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-172736</guid>
		<description>Jeez / Mo, guys and girls - get a life!  In fact, get several - sequentially, preferably.  Like we former Buddhists did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez / Mo, guys and girls &#8211; get a life!  In fact, get several &#8211; sequentially, preferably.  Like we former Buddhists did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daz</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-168931</link>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-168931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m two years too late with this but i needed to scream.... Someone claiming to be well educated used the phrase &quot;[Jesus was...] 110% peaceful.&quot;  ARRRGGGGH! I will not call people names. I will not call people names ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m two years too late with this but i needed to scream&#8230;. Someone claiming to be well educated used the phrase &#8220;[Jesus was...] 110% peaceful.&#8221;  ARRRGGGGH! I will not call people names. I will not call people names &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts of a Dying Atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-166120</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts of a Dying Atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-166120</guid>
		<description>r00db00y:

*Religion* is an entirely human concept. Man invented gods as a way of trying to make sense of what&#039;s around us. How can Bronze Age myths possibly be right about the universe? Even if gods existed, how can humans presume to know exactly what they&#039;re like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r00db00y:</p>
<p>*Religion* is an entirely human concept. Man invented gods as a way of trying to make sense of what&#8217;s around us. How can Bronze Age myths possibly be right about the universe? Even if gods existed, how can humans presume to know exactly what they&#8217;re like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catnip</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76246</link>
		<dc:creator>catnip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76246</guid>
		<description>I have been reading for a long time, but now I feel inclined to answer too. 

r00db00y: Yes, reason is a &quot;human&quot; concept, it happens in human brains (and those of animals too, as has been helpfully pointed out). Believing that those blobs of cells are capable of grasping the big giant cosmic truth, if there is one, is by reason an arrogant assumption, I agree to that fully. 

The difference between a scientific approach to things and a religious one is simply that with scientific thinking you accept that there is infinitely much that you do not know, and after the first shock and probably a few depressive moments you start being happy about what you DO know. Which is what you can test by experiment. 

Those are your assumptions. Between those, logical laws that need to be tested as well apply. (For example: If it rains, the street is wet. If the street is wet, it did not neccessarily rain. All you know is A=&gt;B. And this simply because in all known cases everything that got rained upon got wet. You &quot;believe&quot; what you see)

The difference between the scientific approach and the religious is that you accept that you are humble and not able to know THA TRUTH, that you make models of what you see and update these regularly (checking the street every now and again, and if for some case it is not wet you enquire why) You regularly change your mind once you find something new and throw your old model down the toilet if you found it being flawed. 

Religion means, you hold onto something that you believe, never test it, and declare it cosmic wisdom, with no or very feeble proof whatsoever. Mostly because some other dude in a shiny robe tells you it is THA TRUTH and you will never have to search again. 
Testing and making your own models is so much more work...

Reason does NOT (yet?) provide the answer to all questions, but it is the only thing we have. 

And claiming to &quot;know&quot; some cosmic truth  beyond it is arrogance or weakness. 

the catnip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading for a long time, but now I feel inclined to answer too. </p>
<p>r00db00y: Yes, reason is a &#8220;human&#8221; concept, it happens in human brains (and those of animals too, as has been helpfully pointed out). Believing that those blobs of cells are capable of grasping the big giant cosmic truth, if there is one, is by reason an arrogant assumption, I agree to that fully. </p>
<p>The difference between a scientific approach to things and a religious one is simply that with scientific thinking you accept that there is infinitely much that you do not know, and after the first shock and probably a few depressive moments you start being happy about what you DO know. Which is what you can test by experiment. </p>
<p>Those are your assumptions. Between those, logical laws that need to be tested as well apply. (For example: If it rains, the street is wet. If the street is wet, it did not neccessarily rain. All you know is A=&gt;B. And this simply because in all known cases everything that got rained upon got wet. You &#8220;believe&#8221; what you see)</p>
<p>The difference between the scientific approach and the religious is that you accept that you are humble and not able to know THA TRUTH, that you make models of what you see and update these regularly (checking the street every now and again, and if for some case it is not wet you enquire why) You regularly change your mind once you find something new and throw your old model down the toilet if you found it being flawed. </p>
<p>Religion means, you hold onto something that you believe, never test it, and declare it cosmic wisdom, with no or very feeble proof whatsoever. Mostly because some other dude in a shiny robe tells you it is THA TRUTH and you will never have to search again.<br />
Testing and making your own models is so much more work&#8230;</p>
<p>Reason does NOT (yet?) provide the answer to all questions, but it is the only thing we have. </p>
<p>And claiming to &#8220;know&#8221; some cosmic truth  beyond it is arrogance or weakness. </p>
<p>the catnip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poor Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76187</link>
		<dc:creator>Poor Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76187</guid>
		<description>WUT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WUT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet another Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76180</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet another Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76180</guid>
		<description>Easter is here! Yay!

This whole &#039;communion&#039; thing bothers me though - all this &#039;eat this wafer, it is the body of Christ&#039;, and the &#039;drink this wine, it is the blood of Christ&#039;. The fact that people eat so much chocolate at Easter is to me deeply symbolic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easter is here! Yay!</p>
<p>This whole &#8216;communion&#8217; thing bothers me though &#8211; all this &#8216;eat this wafer, it is the body of Christ&#8217;, and the &#8216;drink this wine, it is the blood of Christ&#8217;. The fact that people eat so much chocolate at Easter is to me deeply symbolic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnWrot</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76166</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-76166</guid>
		<description>I have only taken the time to view a couple of these comics so far, but here are my thoughts none-the-less.  They are far less intelligent (no offense to the creators, truly) than they clearly intend to portray themselves as.  Here&#039;s the long and the short of the reason why:

Jesus - Actual Son of God, Divine, Has all knowledge as He is God, Died, Rose, Saved Mankind from their sins, and 110% Peaceful. (whether you buy it or not, this is most certainly what He claimed &amp; Lived.)
Mohammed - Desert Merchant, denies Christ&#039;s divinity AND death, learned about Christianity and Judiasm from other unlearned merchants and fleeing heretics, respat it out as &quot;divine word&quot; (like a bad game of &quot;telephone&quot;), died, is still dead, led mankind astray from Christ, and 75% violent. (whether you like it or not, this is most certainly what he claimed &amp; lived.)

I&#039;m not a Right-Wing blah blah blah blah blah.  I am educated.

This way we can all dodge the &quot;reason&quot; thing and use &quot;facts&quot; to make our choices.
And no, reason is not inherently bad, it&#039;s an AMAZING tool and gift.
Use it.

In Him,
John Wrot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only taken the time to view a couple of these comics so far, but here are my thoughts none-the-less.  They are far less intelligent (no offense to the creators, truly) than they clearly intend to portray themselves as.  Here&#8217;s the long and the short of the reason why:</p>
<p>Jesus &#8211; Actual Son of God, Divine, Has all knowledge as He is God, Died, Rose, Saved Mankind from their sins, and 110% Peaceful. (whether you buy it or not, this is most certainly what He claimed &amp; Lived.)<br />
Mohammed &#8211; Desert Merchant, denies Christ&#8217;s divinity AND death, learned about Christianity and Judiasm from other unlearned merchants and fleeing heretics, respat it out as &#8220;divine word&#8221; (like a bad game of &#8220;telephone&#8221;), died, is still dead, led mankind astray from Christ, and 75% violent. (whether you like it or not, this is most certainly what he claimed &amp; lived.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Right-Wing blah blah blah blah blah.  I am educated.</p>
<p>This way we can all dodge the &#8220;reason&#8221; thing and use &#8220;facts&#8221; to make our choices.<br />
And no, reason is not inherently bad, it&#8217;s an AMAZING tool and gift.<br />
Use it.</p>
<p>In Him,<br />
John Wrot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry w.</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-75990</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-75990</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken scissors to an old bumpersticker that I was handed on the street,

and here&#039;s the results:

Out with the old.......

no jesus
know peace

In with the new........

know jesus
no peace

Now, I know that some bumpersticker somewhere has to work for Mo.....

http://boskolives.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken scissors to an old bumpersticker that I was handed on the street,</p>
<p>and here&#8217;s the results:</p>
<p>Out with the old&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>no jesus<br />
know peace</p>
<p>In with the new&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>know jesus<br />
no peace</p>
<p>Now, I know that some bumpersticker somewhere has to work for Mo&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://boskolives.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://boskolives.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry w.</title>
		<link>http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-75989</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesusandmo.net/2008/03/14/same/#comment-75989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken scissors to an old bumpersticker that I was handed on the street,

and here&#039;s the results:

Out with the old.......

no jesus
know peace

In with the new........

know jesus
no peace

Now, I know that some bumpersticker somewhere has to work for Mo.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken scissors to an old bumpersticker that I was handed on the street,</p>
<p>and here&#8217;s the results:</p>
<p>Out with the old&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>no jesus<br />
know peace</p>
<p>In with the new&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>know jesus<br />
no peace</p>
<p>Now, I know that some bumpersticker somewhere has to work for Mo&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: 66d133386bd09f996573cef0c579c568
Cache created: 11-02-2012 02:06:12
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0(5)
-->
