Comments on: blood http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/ Comic featuring Jesus and Mohammed Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:25:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Tom http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-2/#comment-164774 Tom Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:32:55 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-164774 To Paper Hand: Your interpretation is actually very close to one modern theological interpretation of the crucifixion. God punishes himself for our sins to show the absurdity of sacrifice - because no sacrifice can ever satisfy God to forgive sins. Once you believe that, then you can also see the absurdity of making deals with God (If you help me do this, then I will do etc.). God doesn't want sacrifices, only unconditional love. That's quite a revolutionary idea, especially in the first century AD. To Paper Hand: Your interpretation is actually very close to one modern theological interpretation of the crucifixion. God punishes himself for our sins to show the absurdity of sacrifice – because no sacrifice can ever satisfy God to forgive sins. Once you believe that, then you can also see the absurdity of making deals with God (If you help me do this, then I will do etc.). God doesn’t want sacrifices, only unconditional love. That’s quite a revolutionary idea, especially in the first century AD.

]]> By: mohamed http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-129330 mohamed Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:10:11 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-129330 wie denk je wel dat je bend wie denk je wel dat je bend

]]> By: ritchan http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-129292 ritchan Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:18:14 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-129292 This is effing brilliant. This is effing brilliant.

]]> By: Paper Hand http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-117685 Paper Hand Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:46:03 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-117685 Todd: How is it just to punish another person? If you really do believe that, I sure hope you're never on a jury, because apparently justice will be served if *someone* is punished for a crime, no matter whether or not it's the person who did it. I think the most logical interpretation of the whole crucifiction story is that God, in the form of Jesus, was atoning for his own sins, paying the price for his general assholery in the Old Testament. Then everything makes sense. God realized he was an asshole, and so he accepted torture and death to make it up to his people, and gave eternal life as compensation for the suffering he'd inflicted upon them from the days of his absurdly over-the-top response to Adam and Eve breaking the "Don't eat that fruit" commandment. Todd: How is it just to punish another person? If you really do believe that, I sure hope you’re never on a jury, because apparently justice will be served if *someone* is punished for a crime, no matter whether or not it’s the person who did it.

I think the most logical interpretation of the whole crucifiction story is that God, in the form of Jesus, was atoning for his own sins, paying the price for his general assholery in the Old Testament. Then everything makes sense. God realized he was an asshole, and so he accepted torture and death to make it up to his people, and gave eternal life as compensation for the suffering he’d inflicted upon them from the days of his absurdly over-the-top response to Adam and Eve breaking the “Don’t eat that fruit” commandment.

]]> By: ToddAwful http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-83265 ToddAwful Tue, 20 May 2008 13:51:21 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-83265 Someone stronger voluntarily takes on the punishment of someone weaker because the stronger can survive the punishment and the weaker cannot. Why so quick do dismiss what you don't understand? That's the same dogmatism of a 6 day creationist. Someone stronger voluntarily takes on the punishment of someone weaker because the stronger can survive the punishment and the weaker cannot. Why so quick do dismiss what you don’t understand? That’s the same dogmatism of a 6 day creationist.

]]> By: Hee hee! Jesus and Mo « Eileen the Episcopalifem: Liberal, Progressive, Feminist, Episcopalian http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-64519 Hee hee! Jesus and Mo « Eileen the Episcopalifem: Liberal, Progressive, Feminist, Episcopalian Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:27:17 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-64519 [...] Here’s the website: http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/ [...] [...] Here’s the website: http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/ [...]

]]> By: jONES. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-64063 jONES. Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:54:06 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-64063 well you'd be the only rick on here... well you’d be the only rick on here…

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63982 Dick M. Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:50:09 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63982 No. I have a cousin named Rich and bro-in-law named Richard. I did not nickname myself. So I am Dick and always will be. But who in hell are you, "Hotwater"? Who are you in hot water with and what about? No. I have a cousin named Rich and bro-in-law named Richard. I did not nickname myself. So I am Dick and always will be. But who in hell are you, “Hotwater”? Who are you in hot water with and what about?

]]> By: hotwater http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63886 hotwater Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:50:16 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63886 Dick, would it be OK to leave it as Dick if you changed your nickname? How about Rick? Rich? Dick, would it be OK to leave it as Dick if you changed your nickname? How about Rick? Rich?

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63832 Dick M. Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:59:26 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63832 Just as I suspected, a waffler. Just as I suspected, a waffler.

]]> By: jONES. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63752 jONES. Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:47:13 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63752 maybe... it depends... do you owe me money? maybe… it depends… do you owe me money?

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63703 Dick M. Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:14:09 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63703 As I asked a couple clicks back, are you the famous C. O. Jones? As I asked a couple clicks back, are you the famous C. O. Jones?

]]> By: jONES. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63668 jONES. Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:15:33 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63668 That's good... We need to teach the English to speak English... wow there is just all sorts of Irony on this page... That’s good… We need to teach the English to speak English… wow there is just all sorts of Irony on this page…

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63658 Dick M. Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:48:20 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63658 A case can be made that in Britain they need to learn to speak proper English. It seems that those folks may actually not know what tool they use for pissing and fornicating. At least the guys. If the Brits get the male part wrong, imagine what the situation with the gals might be. A case can be made that in Britain they need to learn to speak proper English. It seems that those folks may actually not know what tool they use for pissing and fornicating. At least the guys. If the Brits get the male part wrong, imagine what the situation with the gals might be.

]]> By: Don http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63571 Don Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:54:09 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63571 Sorry, mate, 'dick' is the appropriate locution in England. Peterhead is a town in Aberdeenshire. Dickhead is ... Sorry, mate, ‘dick’ is the appropriate locution in England.

Peterhead is a town in Aberdeenshire.

Dickhead is …

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63254 Dick M. Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:46:01 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63254 By the way, are you the famous C. O. Jones? By the way, are you the famous C. O. Jones?

]]> By: jONES. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63240 jONES. Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:38:46 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63240 I think Dick just doesn't want you using his name as a punchline... Which is ironic considering he's on his way to becoming a punchline just from all these posts about Dicks... I think Dick just doesn’t want you using his name as a punchline… Which is ironic considering he’s on his way to becoming a punchline just from all these posts about Dicks…

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63227 Dick M. Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:17:34 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63227 Well, if that's so, then why not use "cock". They've got Cockneys in Britain don't they? Well, if that’s so, then why not use “cock”. They’ve got Cockneys in Britain don’t they?

]]> By: DinahA http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63217 DinahA Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:22:24 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63217 As Peter is NEVER used as a name for the penis in Britain, the joke would not have worked. The author is British, so it's not surprising that he uses a name for the penis that we in Britain actually use. As Peter is NEVER used as a name for the penis in Britain, the joke would not have worked. The author is British, so it’s not surprising that he uses a name for the penis that we in Britain actually use.

]]> By: Dick M. http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/comment-page-1/#comment-63123 Dick M. Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:20:08 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/11/09/blood/#comment-63123 No, but there was a Peter. No, but there was a Peter.

]]>