Comments on: math http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/ Two prophets, living together. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:52:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: C Reese http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-172682 C Reese Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:57:00 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-172682 Their genetics are downright supernatural. At least the breakfast cereal Christ Crispies is divine with wine. Their genetics are downright supernatural. At least the breakfast cereal Christ Crispies is divine with wine.

]]> By: mothwentbad http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-141492 mothwentbad Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:59:53 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-141492 Saint Gasoline is probably referring to The Wandering Jew. Look it up on Wikipedia for some lulz. Saint Gasoline is probably referring to The Wandering Jew. Look it up on Wikipedia for some lulz.

]]> By: peterNW1 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-77393 peterNW1 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:50:57 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-77393 Why has the author made Mo smarter than Jesus? I mean this is not the impression one gets from reading the New Testament and Qur'an back to back. Why has the author made Mo smarter than Jesus?

I mean this is not the impression one gets from reading the New Testament and Qur’an back to back.

]]> By: TB http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-8134 TB Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:39:51 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-8134 @Despard: Big LOL. The game sucks hard... @Despard: Big LOL. The game sucks hard…

]]> By: Neil Hoskins http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-7605 Neil Hoskins Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:44:26 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-7605 Mark, that's interesting stuff and reminds me of the Taoist or Tai Chi diagram, which most people know as the yin-yang diagram. (example: http://www.kheper.net/integral/diagrams_of_reality.htm#Tao) This geometrical approach to philosophy is interesting and as you look at it, things in nature do, indeed, seem to conform to the patterns conveyed by the diagram. There are also modern equivalents, like Chaos Theory. However, as with most of these things, what started out as a philosophy get hijacked by priests and turned into a "belief system", and before you know it, people are rattling bones, spinning prayer wheels, and trying to predict the future. Mark, that’s interesting stuff and reminds me of the Taoist or Tai Chi diagram, which most people know as the yin-yang diagram. (example: http://www.kheper.net/integral/diagrams_of_reality.htm#Tao)

This geometrical approach to philosophy is interesting and as you look at it, things in nature do, indeed, seem to conform to the patterns conveyed by the diagram. There are also modern equivalents, like Chaos Theory. However, as with most of these things, what started out as a philosophy get hijacked by priests and turned into a “belief system”, and before you know it, people are rattling bones, spinning prayer wheels, and trying to predict the future.

]]> By: James http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-7191 James Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:07:06 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-7191 I've always wondered if sufficient DNA could be extracted from transubstantiated wine to enable a clone of Jesus to be produced. It would be an interesting test of Catholic beliefs and would, if successful, conclusively prove their case. I suspect, however, that the result would be a grape vine - probably a more reliable source of information than the Church... I’ve always wondered if sufficient DNA could be extracted from transubstantiated wine to enable a clone of Jesus to be produced. It would be an interesting test of Catholic beliefs and would, if successful, conclusively prove their case.

I suspect, however, that the result would be a grape vine – probably a more reliable source of information than the Church…

]]> By: mark http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6627 mark Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:45:09 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6627 someone needs to make a spiritual ideology out of math. i say we start with the aptly named 'Boy's surface' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy%27s_surface its mathematical birth and rebirth combined. :-) someone needs to make a spiritual ideology out of math. i say we start with the aptly named ‘Boy’s surface’

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy%27s_surface

its mathematical birth and rebirth combined. :-)

]]> By: Saint Gasoline http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6220 Saint Gasoline Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:35:33 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6220 Catholic literary interpretation is also quite interesting. Apparently when Jesus says that he will return within the lifetimes of those who knew him, he was talking about his friend Jim, who has miraculously managed to live tot he ripe old age of 2037. Catholic literary interpretation is also quite interesting. Apparently when Jesus says that he will return within the lifetimes of those who knew him, he was talking about his friend Jim, who has miraculously managed to live tot he ripe old age of 2037.

]]> By: TaoAndZen http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6099 TaoAndZen Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:36:40 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-6099 Yeti, unfortunately not. The vatican has elaborated on this by saying that the "Jesuswafer", although actualy becoming his flesh (fat, bone, muscle or gristly bit is not specified), retains its empirical appearance as a wheaty snack. I suppose it is rather like the Flying Spaghetti Monster who, every time a Scientist takes a measurement, extends His Noodly Appendage and alters the data thereby deceiving him or her into thinking the Earth is over 4 billion years old when in reality it's only a few thousand. Why this is so is a mystery, though it might be to prevent the priest from becoming sick on congealed blood while tippling the communion wine. Yeti, unfortunately not. The vatican has elaborated on this by saying that the “Jesuswafer”, although actualy becoming his flesh (fat, bone, muscle or gristly bit is not specified), retains its empirical appearance as a wheaty snack. I suppose it is rather like the Flying Spaghetti Monster who, every time a Scientist takes a measurement, extends His Noodly Appendage and alters the data thereby deceiving him or her into thinking the Earth is over 4 billion years old when in reality it’s only a few thousand. Why this is so is a mystery, though it might be to prevent the priest from becoming sick on congealed blood while tippling the communion wine.

]]> By: Yeti http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-5962 Yeti Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:49:45 +0000 http://www.jesusandmo.net/2007/01/22/math/#comment-5962 Does this mean we could clone jesus by making a catholic throw up after transubstantiation, taking a sample of the jesuswafer and inserting any genetic material into an embryonic stem cell? Does this mean we could clone jesus by making a catholic throw up after transubstantiation, taking a sample of the jesuswafer and inserting any genetic material into an embryonic stem cell?

]]>